Correlation of Memory Ability with Learning Outcomes Students at Elementary School
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35719/educare.v4i1.196Keywords:
Correlatio, Students' Memory Ability, Learning OutcomesAbstract
This study aims to examine the correlation of students' memory skills to the mathematics learning outcomes of fourth grade students at SDN Jurumudi 4, Tangerang city. The method used is quantitative correlation. The data analysis technique uses a significance of 0.05 with a prerequisite test consisting of a normality test, linearity test, hypothesis testing (product moment person correlation and correlation coefficient significance test with the t test). The results of this study: (1) students' memory skills through descriptive statistical analysis found that there were 32 students in grade IV C at SDN Jurumudi 4 Tangerang city with an average memory score of 81.09 in the high category. (2) The learning outcomes of students in class IV C at SDN Jurumudi 4 Tangerang city in learning mathematics about fractional material equal to the number of students as many as 32 people with an average score of 76.31 in the high category. (3) The results of hypothesis testing through inferential statistics show that there is a correlation between students' memory skills and the mathematics learning outcomes of fourth-grade students at SDN Jurumudi 4, Tangerang City, with a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.429 and sig.0.014. It can be seen from the table of the level of correlation and the strength of the relationship. between the two variables is at the magnitude of 0.40-0.599 indicating that there is a moderate or sufficient correlation. Furthermore, to test the hypothesis using the correlation coefficient significance test with the t test and the results obtained are tcount > ttable (2.601 > 2.042) the hypothesis is accepted.
References
Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction to Measurement Theory. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
Almulla, M. A. (2023). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for students’ critical thinking, creativity, and problem solving to affect academic performance in higher education. Cogent Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2172929
Chen, H., & Yang, J. (2020). Multiple Exposures Enhance Both Item Memory and Contextual Memory Over Time. Frontiers in psychology, 11, 565169. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.565169
Chew, S. L., & Cerbin, W. J. (2020). The cognitive challenges of effective teaching. The Journal of Economic Education, 52(1), 17–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.2020.1845266
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2003). Research Methods in Education (6th ed.). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(1), 87–114. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X01003922
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. London: Sage.
Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Demetriou, A., Spanoudis, G. C., Greiff, S., Makris, N., Panaoura, R., & Kazi, S. (2022). Changing priorities in the development of cognitive competence and school learning: A general theory. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 954971. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.954971
Du, X., Chen, C., & Lin, H. (2022). The impact of working memory capacity on collaborative learning in elementary school students. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 1027523. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1027523
Fauhah, H., & Rosy, B. (2021). Analisis Model Pembelajaran Make A Match Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Administrasi Perkantoran (JPAP), 9 (2): 321–34. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpap.v9n2.p321-334
Field, A. (2013). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics (4th ed.). London: Sage.
Gagne, R. M., & White, R. T. (1978). Memory Structures and Learning Outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 48(2), 187–222. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170081
Gleason, B. L., Peeters, M. J., Resman-Targoff, B. H., Karr, S., McBane, S., Kelley, K., Thomas, T., & Denetclaw, T. H. (2011). An active-learning strategies primer for achieving ability-based educational outcomes. American journal of pharmaceutical education, 75(9), 186. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe759186
Hapnita, W., Abdullah, R., Gusmareta, Y., & Rizal, F. (2017). Faktor Internal Dan Eksternal Yang Dominan Siswa Kelas Xi Teknik Gambar Bangunan Smk N 1 Padang Tahun 2016 / 2017. 5, no. 1 (2017).
Hasratuddin. (2011). Membangun Karakter Melalui Pembelajaran Matematika. Paradikma: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (PJPM), 4(2). 130–41. https://doi.org/10.24114/paradikma.v6i2.1066
Howell, D. C. (2012). Statistical Methods for Psychology (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Hu, J., Peng, Y., Chen, X., & Yu, H. (2021). Differentiating the learning styles of college students in different disciplines in a college English blended learning setting. PloS one, 16(5), e0251545. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251545
Idris, R., Govindasamy, P., Nachiappan, S., & Bacotang, J. (2023). Exploring the Impact of Cognitive Factors on Learning, Motivation, and Career in Malaysia’s STEM Education. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(6), 1669 – 1684. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i6/17227
Jamil, N., Belkacem, A. N., Ouhbi, S., & Guger, C. (2021). Cognitive and Affective Brain–Computer Interfaces for Improving Learning Strategies and Enhancing Student Capabilities: A Systematic Literature Review. in IEEE Access, vol 9, pp. 134122-134147. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3115263
Kline, P. (2005). Handbook of Psychological Testing (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Kliziene, I., Paskovske, A., Cizauskas, G., Augustiniene, A., Simonaitiene, B., & Kubiliunas, R. (2022). The Impact of Achievements in Mathematics on Cognitive Ability in Primary School. Brain sciences, 12(6), 736. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12060736
Kozhevnikov, M., Evans, C., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2014). Cognitive Style as Environmentally Sensitive Individual Differences in Cognition: A Modern Synthesis and Applications in Education, Business, and Management. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 15(1), 3-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100614525555
Leder, G.C., Forgasz, H.J. (2002). Measuring Methematical Beliefs and Their Impact on the Learning of Mathematics: A New Approach. In: Leder, G.C., Pehkonen, E., Törner, G. (eds) Beliefs: A Hidden Variable in Mathematics Education?. Mathematics Education Library, vol 31. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47958-3_6
Machali, I. (2017). Statistik Itu Mudah. Yogyakarta: UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta.
Marinda, L. (2020). Teori Perkembangan Kognitif Jean Piaget Dan Problematikanya Pada Anak Usia Sekolah Dasar. An-Nisa Journal of Gender Studies, 13(1), 116–152. https://doi.org/10.35719/annisa.v13i1.26
Mones, A. Y. (2020). Upaya Meningkatkan Daya Ingat Siswa Kelas Iv Melalui Penerapan Metode Praktek Dan Latihan Terstruktur Pada Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Katolik (Studi Lapangan di SD Negeri Nunbai, TIMOR NTT). Selidik (Jurnal Seputar Penelitian Pendidikan Keagamaan), 1(1), 19–29. Retrieved from https://ejurnal.org/index.php/selidik/article/view/4
Nelwan, M., Friso-van den Bos, I., Vissers, C., & Kroesbergen, E. (2021). The relation between working memory, number sense, and mathematics throughout primary education in children with and without mathematical difficulties. Child Neuropsychology, 28(2), 143–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2021.1959905
Nofindra, R. (2019). Ingatan, Lupa Dan Transfer Dalam Belajar Dan Pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Rokania, 4(1), 21 - 34. Retrieved from https://e-jurnal.stkiprokania.ac.id/index.php/jpr/article/view/188
Novitasari, D. (2015). Kemampuan Pemahaman, and Konsep Matematis. “Pengaruh Penggunaan Multimedia Intraktif Terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematika Siswa. FIBONACCI: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Matematika, 2(2). 8–18. https://doi.org/10.24853/fbc.2.2.8-18
Paas, F., & Ayres, P. (2014). Cognitive Load Theory: A Broader View on the Role of Memory in Learning and Education. Educ Psychol Rev 26, 191–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9263-5
Pane, A., & Dasopang, M. D. (2017). Belajar Dan Pembelajaran. FITRAH: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-ilmu Keislaman, 3(2), 333-352. https://doi.org/10.24952/fitrah.v3i2.945
Pillado, I. A., Futalan, M. C. Z., & Comighud, S. M. T. (2020). Factors on Memory Retention: Effect to Students' Academic Performance. Factors on Memory Retention: Effect to Students' Academic Performance, 6(4), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3780621
Pratiwi, A. F. (2017). Peningkatan Daya Ingat Anak Usia Dini Melalui Media Mind Mapping Pada Kelompok B Di Tk Islam Al-Muttaqin Kota Jambi. pp. 1-21. https://repository.unja.ac.id/2530/
Saleh, A. A. (2018). Pengantar Psikologi. Makassar Sulawesi Selatan: Aksara Timur.
Schlichting, M. L., & Preston, A. R. (2015). Memory integration: neural mechanisms and implications for behavior. Current opinion in behavioral sciences, 1, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2014.07.005
Shi, Y., & Qu, S. (2022). The effect of cognitive ability on academic achievement: The mediating role of self-discipline and the moderating role of planning. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 1014655. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1014655
Sridhar, S., Khamaj, A., & Asthana, M. K. (2023). Cognitive neuroscience perspective on memory: overview and summary. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 17, 1217093. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2023.1217093
St Clair?Thompson, H. L., & Botton, C. (2009). Working memory and science education: exploring the compatibility of theoretical approaches. Research in Science & Technological Education, 27(2), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140902853616
Suralaga, F. (2021). Psikologi Pendidikan. Depok: PT. Rajagrafindo Persada.
Tyng, C. M., Amin, H. U., Saad, M. N. M., & Malik, A. S. (2017). The Influences of Emotion on Learning and Memory. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 1454. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01454
Wahyuning, S. (2021). Statistik Dasar-Dasar. Semarang: Yayasan Prima Agus Tekdik.
Walsh, M.M., Krusmark, M.A., & Jastrembski, T. (2023). Enhancing learning and retention through the distribution of practice repetitions across multiple sessions. Mem Cogn 51, 455–472. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-022-01361-8
Warsah, I., & Daheri, M. (2021). Psikologi Suatu Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Tunas Gemilang Press.
Woolley, G. (2011). Reading Comprehension. In: Reading Comprehension. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1174-7_2
Xenofontos, C., & Mouroutsou, S. (2022). Resilience in mathematics education research: a systematic review of empirical studies. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 67(7), 1041–1055. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2022.2115132
Yunos, N. M., Thangal, T. B. T., Rahmat, N. H., Sharif, N. F. M., Ahmad, S. N., & Latif, N. A. (2022). Motivation for Learning Mathematics: A Study Across Disciplines. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(9), 1135 – 1154. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i9/14526
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ni'matul Izza, Wardah Tul Zanah, Putri Utami R, Ahmad Giri AM
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
The author holds the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
All material contained on this site is protected by law. It is prohibited to cite part or all of the contents of this website for commercial purposes without the approval of this journal's editorial board.
If you find one or more articles contained in EDUCARE: Journal of Primary Education that violates or has the potential to violate your copyright, please report it to us via email at Principle Contact.
The formal legal aspect of access to any information and articles listed on this journal website refers to the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY-SA) license.
All Information contained in EDUCARE: Journal of Primary Education is academic. EDUCARE: Journal of Primary Education is not responsible for any losses incurred due to misuse of information from this site.